What is psychological egoism, and how does it differ from ethical egoism? What do you think is the best argument in favor of the theory? Do you think the theory. Psychological Egoism is the thesis that we always act from selfish motives. It holds that all don’t you see?” Taken from Feinberg, ‘Psychological Egoism’. Moral Motivation and Human Nature. Psychological Egoism*. JOEL FEINBERG. A. THE THEORY. 1. “PSYCHOLOGICAL EGOISM” is the name given to a theory.

Author: Samulrajas Arashile
Country: Guinea-Bissau
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Medical
Published (Last): 3 May 2007
Pages: 71
PDF File Size: 16.87 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.43 Mb
ISBN: 230-8-43786-344-7
Downloads: 77993
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vugis

This is analogous to the tennis player who only enjoys tennis when she wins. If we really only do things for the sake of pleasure or avoiding pain, then a person like Jones p. Feinberg has multiple responses to this one: The second argument for psychological egoism [getting what one wants and receiving pleasure] is also flawed: My presentations Profile Feedback Log out.

Only by letting go of the desire to enjoy winning a game is she able to enjoy the pleasure of winning a game It may be true that happiness is all that is valuable in many of these cases, but this does not entail that the ends of our desires is always happiness, though it may often be a by-product.

The essay was originally composed by Professor Feinberg fsinberg his students inand appeared regularly in his Reason and Responsibility of which there were many editions published by Wadsworth.

His major four-volume work, The Moral Limits of the Criminal Lawwas published between and Analytical jurisprudence Deontological ethics Interpretivism Legalism Legal moralism Legal positivism Legal realism Psgchological theories of law Natural law Paternalism Utilitarianism Virtue jurisprudence.


Nonetheless, they might contend that our other ultimate motives self-fulfillment, power, etc.

Namely, nothing follows from a tautology. Altruism and Psychological Egoism in Normative Ethics categorize this paper.

History of Western Philosophy. According to Mill, the only kind of conduct that the state may rightly criminalize is conduct that causes harm to others. The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Classical and Feunberg Readings sixth edition Belmont: That means all actions are selfish. Desiring happiness per se would make no sense if this is what is meant by it.

In the final argument, Feinberg sees a paradox. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Broad – – Hibbert Journal In the process, he defends osychological many would view as characteristically “liberal” positions on topics such as suicide, obscenity, pornography, hate speech, and euthanasia. So I’m missing something or I’m misunderstanding the force of the conclusion.

In a paper prepared in for the benefit of students at Brown, Feinberg seeks to refute the philosophical theory of psychological egoismwhich in his opinion is fallacious. Broad on Psychological Egoism.

Joel Feinberg

January Learn how and when to remove this template message. Critical Ceinberg Critical thinking involves awareness, practice, and motivation.

He nevertheless adjudges that such a sweeping generalisation is unlikely to be true. Some of the acts involve affronts to the senses e. Constructs such as ibid. Still others involve affronts to our religious, moral, or patriotic sensibilities e.

He is known for his work in the fields of ethicsaction theoryphilosophy of lawand political philosophy [1] as well as individual rights and the authority of the state. If a person asserts or believes a general statement in such a way that he cannot conceive of any possible experience which he would count as evidence against it, then he cannot be said to be asserting or believing an empirical hypothesis.


Often, how we think and what we think. I apologize, I was a little tired joe I wrote up the post.

Joel Feinberg – Wikipedia

Retrieved from ” https: Once she is no longer playing to win, she relaxes and thus wins. Her desire to win makes her anxious during her matches, and thus she does not play well and loses. So far as he can tell, there are four primary arguments psychologcal it:. Critique of Psychological Egoism: By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. The desire for happiness alone will often, and perhaps necessarily, alienate desiring individual from achieving the desire.

No keywords specified fix it. March 14, at 9: This article has no associated abstract.

Psychological Egoism By Joel Feinberg

The fourth argument for psychological egoism [pleasure, pain, and moral education] leads to paradox: This is supposed to be a psychological fact of human motivations. Please improve this article by replacing them with named references quick guideor an abbreviated title.

Joshua May – – Internet Encyclopeida of Philosophy. Joel Feinberg presents a multitude of arguments against psychological egoistic hedonism. Critical legal studies Comparative law Economic analysis International legal theory Legal history Philosophy of law Sociology of law.

Joel Feinberg: Psychological Egoism

The thought experiment is designed to test the limits of our tolerance for harmless but deeply offensive forms of behavior. Sign in to use this feature.

It’s hard to follow these arguments.